menu

Arbitration and its Formal Requirements in the Middle Eastern and Arab Countries

I. Freedom of Choice and Admissibility of Arbitral Awards

All Middle Eastern and Arab legal systems recognize the principle of “freedom to contract” in which a contract forms the law governing the relationship between the parties that have entered into it; it cannot be revoked or altered except by mutual consent of the parties or for reasons provided for by law.1 Certain Middle Eastern and Arab arbitration laws clearly permit those who are party to a contract to concur on a forum selection clause in order to establish where and how to settle any contractual disputes.2 However, in the absence of the parties’ agreement, state courts generally rely on the conflict of law rules contained in their national law to guide or govern their decisions.3 Interestingly, the Bahraini Arbitration Law stipulates that the provisions of the UNCITRAL Model Law4 shall be applicable to every international commercial arbitration, except in instances where the parties involved have agreed that it shall be subject to another law.5

 

Enforcement of a particular arbitration award may be refused by Middle Eastern and Arab courts due to its violation of the public policy of the state concerned or its moral standards.6 The majority of Middle Eastern and Arab countries provide within their laws that one of the grounds for raising an action to set aside an arbitral award can be the non-existence of the arbitral agreement, its nullity or it being subject to annulment or voidness for contract expiry.7

 

As for the arbitration award rendered, the laws governing most Middle Eastern and Arab countries provide that the competent court seized with the action for nullity shall rule sua sponte for the annulment of the arbitral award if its contents violate public policy in the designated country.8 Saudi Arabian Arbitration Law mentions the same, with the qualification that the award must not violate Islamic Shari’a principles.9 The matter of the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards is perhaps further discussed in the New York Convention,10, to which all Middle Eastern and Arab countries are signatories with the exception of Iraq, Libya and Yemen.

 

Some Middle Eastern and Arab countries exhibit reluctance towards the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards. For example, certain countries stipulate that the enforcement of the arbitral award may not be ordered except after verifying that it does not contradict public policy in the enforcing country.11 Saudi Arabia and Yemen further add the provision that no foreign arbitration award shall be enforced in either country if it violates Islamic Shari’a principles, not just public policy.12 Prior to the issuance of the new Saudi Arabian Arbitration Law of 2012, the Saudi judicial system generally applied Saudi law even if the parties involved had consented to applying another law. Despite Saudi Arabia being a member of the New York Convention,13 in practice the Saudi legal system rarely recognizes or enforces the agreements of foreign jurisdictions.14 By contrast, Syria has adopted a more flexible approach towards the enforcement of international arbitral awards, whereby such awards are to be enforced if they were deemed final, conclusive and enforceable in the country in which they were rendered. 15

Special Form Requirements

With regard to special form requirements, some Middle Eastern and Arab legal systems state, either in their arbitration or procedural laws, that the parties involved can only agree to settle their dispute through arbitration in a document, be it as a stipulation in the main contract or in a separate document. Hence, the arbitration agreement can only be accepted if it is provided in writing.16

 

When it comes to the structuring of arbitration agreements in certain Middle Eastern and Arab countries, national arbitration laws consider the writing requirement to be a prerequisite but may adopt a more lenient definition of “writing” than Article II of the New York Convention, where the law does not require the agreement to be signed, but nevertheless the absence of a signature will support any argument against its existence.17 Still other Middle Eastern and Arab countries give a special definition to the writing requirement, this being broader and more modern than that of the New York convention.18 Oman and the United Arab Emirates require that the language of arbitration be Arabic unless the parties agree otherwise, in which case a legalized, or official, translation of the award is to be provided.19

 

Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Oman, Tunisia and Yemen have adopted, or were influenced to a large extent by, the UNCITAL Model Law in their national arbitration laws. Hence they adopted the formal requirement of writing, stipulating that if the agreement is not concluded in writing it shall be null and void. Saudi Arbitration Law also necessitates the writing requirement of the arbitration agreement, or else the agreement is void.20 Further, Moroccan Arbitration Law stipulates that the arbitration clause in any commercial contract should be hand21written. However case law has since superseded that requirement, after Morocco joined the New York Convention.22 Syrian case law considers that requiring the arbitration clause to be solely in writing makes it rather troublesome to accept other means of evidence. Subsequently, writing is a requirement for the validity of the arbitration clause but not for giving evidence thereof.23 The Libyan Supreme Court also necessitates such a requirement.24

 

Algerian, Lebanese and Moroccan Civil Procedural Laws provide that an arbitration agreement must include the subject of the dispute and the name of the arbitrators or else the agreement shall be void.25 Meanwhile the rest of the Middle Eastern and Arab Procedural Laws state that the subject of the dispute must either be provided in the arbitration agreement or mentioned during the hearings, or else the arbitration shall be void.26

 

One striking requirement for the formation of the arbitration agreement is that which relates to the capacity of those who are party to the agreement. The majority of Middle Eastern and Arab countries provide within their laws that one of the grounds for raising an action to not enforce an arbitral award can be admissible in case of the incapacity of one of the parties to the arbitral agreement.27

 

With regard to the capacity of natural persons (or, for non-lawyers, individuals) to choose the applicable law for their agreement, most civil codes refer to the law of the individual’s country of nationality.28 Similarly, the capacity of foreign juristic persons such as companies, associations, foundations or others is governed by the law of the place where they were constituted, where their head offices are located or where they have their actual principal seat of management.29 If, however a juristic person carries on its principal activities in a domestic country other than that of its principal seat of management, then the law of the domestic country applies.30 With regard to obligations arising from the contracts, the law of the state in which the parties to the contract reside shall be applicable (the law of domicile), and in the absence of a common domicile, then the law of the place where the contract was concluded applies, provided that the parties to the contract have not agreed upon the application of a specific law.

 

Mohamed Hafez - Partner SQUARE Law Firm
Law Today Magazine

 

 

  1. See Algeria Article 106 Civil Code; Bahrain Article 128 Civil Code; Egypt Article 147 Civil Code; Kuwait Article 196 Civil Code; Lebanon Article 221 Code of Obligations; Libya Article 147 Civil Code; Mauritania Article 250 Code of Obligations; Morocco Article 230 Code of Obligations; Qatar Article 171 Civil Code; Syria Article 148 Civil Code; Tunisia Article 242 Code of Obligations. 2
  2. See Algeria Article 444 Arbitration Law; Jordan Article 24 Arbitration Law; Lebanon Article 811 Civil Procedural Law; Oman Article 6 Arbitration Law; Yemen Article 45 Arbitration Law.
  3. See Bahrain Article 7 Civil Code; Egypt Article 24 Civil Code; Iraq Article 17(1) Civil Code; Jordan Articles 11 and 25 Civil Code; Libya Article 24 Civil Code; Yemen Article 23 Civil Code.
  4. See the UNCITRAL Model law that was issued by the United Nations Commission for International Trade law (UNCITRAL) in 1985.
  5. See Bahrain Article 1 Legislative Decree no. 9 of 1994 with respect to promulgating the International Commercial Arbitration Law.
  6. See Egypt Article 28 Civil Code; Iraq Article 32 Civil Code; Jordan Article 29 Civil Code; Lebanon Articles 800(6) and 817 Civil Procedural Law; Libya Article 28 Civil Code; Libya Article 740 Civil & Commercial Procedural Law.
  7. See Algeria Article 458(1) Arbitration Law; Bahrain Article 243(1) Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Egypt Article 53(1)(a) Arbitration Law; Iraq Article 273(1) Civil Procedural Law; Jordan Article 49(a)(1) Arbitration Law; Kuwait Article 186(a) Civil & Commercial Procedural Law, Lebanon Article. 800(1) Civil Procedural Law; Libya Article 769(1) Civil Procedural Law; Oman Article 53(1)(a) Arbitration Law; Qatar Article 207(1) Civil & Commercial
    Procedural Law; Saudi Arabia Article 50(1) Arbitration Law; United Arab Emirates Article 216(1)(a) Civil Procedural Law; Yemen Article 53(a) of Arbitration Law.
  8. See Algeria Article 442 Arbitration Law; Egypt Article 53(2) and 58 Arbitration Law; Iraq Article 273(2) Civil Procedural Law; Jordan Article 49(b) Arbitration Law; Lebanon Articles 800(6) and 814 Civil Procedural Law; Mauritania Articles 8(1) and 38(4) Arbitration Law; Morocco Article 321 Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Oman Articles 53(2) and 58 Arbitration Law; Qatar Articles 198 and 207 Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Tunisia Articles 7(1), 42(4) and 78 Arbitration Law; Yemen Article 5(d) Arbitration Law.
  9. See Article 50(2) Saudi Arabia Arbitration Law.
  10. See the New York Convention for the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958.
  11. See Algeria Article 458 Arbitration Law; Egypt Article 58 Arbitration Law; Iraq Article 16 Civil Code; Oman Article 58 Arbitration Law; Tunisia Article 81 Arbitration Law.
  12. See Saudi Arabia 55(2)(b) Saudi Arabia Arbitration Law; Yemen Article 35 Civil Code; Yemen Article 53(g) Arbitration Law.
  13. Saudi Arabia became a signatory to the New York Convention for the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in 1994. 20
  14. Fatima Akdaff, Application of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) to Arab Islamic Countries: Is the CISG Compatible with Islamic Law Principles?, 2001 13, Pace Interna- tional Law Review, 1-58, pages. 9-10. http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/akaddaf.html
  15. Fatima Akdaff, Application of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) to Arab Islamic Countries: Is the CISG Compatible with Islamic Law Principles?, 2001 13, Pace Interna- tional Law Review, 1-58, pages. 9-10. http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/akaddaf.html 
  16. See Algeria Article 443 Civil Procedural Law; Bahrain Article 233 Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Egypt Articles 10 and 12 Arbitration Law; Iraq Article 252 Civil Procedural Law; Jordan Articles 10 and 12 Arbitration Law; Kuwait Article 173 Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Lebanon Articles 763 and 766 Civil Procedural Law; Libya Article 742 Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Morocco Article 307 Civil Procedural Law; Oman Articles 10 and 12 Arbitration Law; Qatar Article 190 Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Saudi Arabia Article 9 Arbitration Law; Syria Article 509 Arbitration Law; United Arab Emirates Article 203(2) Civil Procedural Law; Yemen Articles 15 and 16 Arbitration Law.
  17. See Iraq Article 252 Civil Procedural Law; Kuwait Article 173 Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Lebanon Article 766 Civil Procedural Law; Libya Article 742 Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Morocco Article 307 Civil and Commercial Procedural Law; Qatar Article 190 Civil and Commercial Procedural Law; United Arab Emirates Article 203(2) Civil Procedural Law; Yemen Article 307 Arbitration Law.
  18. See Egypt Article 12 Arbitration Law; Jordan Article 10 Arbitration Law; Oman Article 12 Arbitration Law; Yemen Article 15 Arbitration Law.
  19. See Oman Article 29 Arbitration Law and United Arab Emirates Article 212(6) Civil Procedural Law in relation to Arbitration.
  20. See Saudi Arabia Article 9 Arbitration Law.
  21. See Morocco Article 307 Civil Procedural Law. Also see Morocco Supreme Council, Decision no. 291, issued on 7 March 2007, Commercial file 19/04. Morocco Supreme Council, Decision no. 240, issued on 13 December 2002, Commercial file 1021/98. Morocco Supreme Council, Decision no. 8, issued on 21 January 1996, Civil file 48431.
  22. See Casablanca Court of Appeal, Decision no. 10850, dated 21 June 1983, Commercial file No 355/83, published in the Journal of Moroccan judgments no. 51, p. 109.
  23. See Syrian Court of Cassation, Decision no. 46 dated 21 January 1979 published in the Syrian Law Journal of 1979, p. 217.
  24. See Libyan Supreme Court, challenge no. 229, session dated 16 April 2003, Judicial Year 45.
  25. See Algeria Article 444 Civil Procedural Law; Lebanon Article 766 Civil Procedural Law; Morocco Article 308 Civil Procedural Law.
  26. See Bahrain Article 233 Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Iraq Article 252 Civil Procedural Law; Kuwait Article 173 Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Libya Article 743 Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Qatar Article 190 Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Syria Article 510 Civil Procedural Law; United Arab Emirates Article 203(3) Civil Procedural Law.
  27. See Bahrain Article 233 Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Egypt Articles 11 and 53(1)(b) Arbitration Law; Iraq Article 254 Civil Procedural Law; Kuwait Article 173 C& Com PL; Jordan Articles 9 and 49(a)(2) Arbitration Law; Libya Articles 740 and 769(3) Civil Procedural Law; Morocco Article 306 Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Oman Articles 11 and 53(1)(b) Arbitration Law; Qatar Articles 190 and 207(2) Civil & Commercial Procedural Law; Saudi Arabia Articles 10 & 50(1)(b) Arbitration Law; Syria Article 507 Civil Procedural Law; Tunisia Article 78(2)(a) Arbitration Law; United Arab Emirates Articles 203(4) and 216(1)(b) Civil Procedural Law; Yemen Article 53(b) Arbitration Law.
  28. See Algeria Article 10 Civil Code; Egypt Article 11 Civil Code; Iraq Article 18(1) Civil Code; Jordan Article 12(1)
    Civil Code; Libya Article 11 Civil Code; Yemen Article 24 Civil Code.
  29. See Algeria Article 10 Civil Code; Egypt Article 11 Civil Code; Jordan Article 12(2) Civil Code; Libya Article 11 Civil Code; Yemen Article 24 Civil Code.
  30. See Egypt Article 11 Civil Code; Jordan Article 12(2) Civil Code; Libya Article 11 Civil Code; Yemen Article 24 Civil Code.
  31. See Algeria Article 18 Civil Code; Egypt Article 19 Civil Code; Iraq Article 25(1) Civil Code; Jordan Article 20(1)
    Civil Code; Libya Article 19 Civil Code; Yemen Article 29 Civil Code.

 

© 2018- SQUARE Law Firm . All rights reserved. Designed & Developed by Road9 Media